Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
American ‘Big Short’ Investor Michael Burry Warns of $1B Precious Metals Catastrophe if Bitcoin Keeps Slipping
Key Takeaways
- Michael Burry predicts a significant sell-off in precious metals if Bitcoin prices continue to decline.
- Bitcoin’s ongoing downturn poses a threat to companies holding significant BTC reserves.
- Companies like Michael Saylor’s Strategy face potential existential crises if Bitcoin falls further.
- Organic reasons for Bitcoin’s downturn are lacking, spurring risk managers to advise selling.
- WEEX Crypto News, 2026-02-04 16:02:57
In the dynamic and volatile world of cryptocurrency, few voices resonate as powerfully as that of Michael Burry, the investor renowned for tackling the 2008 financial crisis in “The Big Short.” Recently, Burry has shifted his keen analytical gaze toward the cryptocurrency market, particularly Bitcoin. Despite Bitcoin being seen as the forefront of the blockchain revolution, Burry remains wary. He has expressed profound concerns that Bitcoin’s ongoing bear market could precipitate a devastating $1 billion sell-off in the precious metals market, particularly gold and silver.
The Correlation Between Bitcoin and Precious Metals
Michael Burry’s concerns come amidst a troubling downturn in cryptocurrency prices. He suggests that this decline could have wider implications, especially for precious metals. His observations suggest that up to $1 billion in assets like gold and silver have been sold off due to plummeting crypto prices. This unexpected correlation highlights the intertwined nature of digital and tangible assets in the current economic climate.
Bitcoin, often touted as “digital gold,” was expected to act as a hedge against market volatility and inflation—traditionally the realm of precious metals. However, Burry argues that Bitcoin has failed to live up to this promise. Its correlation with metals has dragged the latter into what he terms “sickening scenarios” where both asset categories suffer due to a single market factor.
The Impact on Companies Holding Bitcoin
The implications of this correlation extend beyond individual investors. Companies with significant Bitcoin holdings are particularly vulnerable. As Bitcoin prices continue to fall—showing a 3.17% decline in just 24 hours—companies that have integrated Bitcoin into their financial strategies face unprecedented risks. Over a week, Bitcoin experienced a staggering 14.44% drop, leaving it trading at $76,362 in the Asian markets as of Wednesday morning.
This sharp decline affects corporate giants like Michael Saylor’s Strategy. Known for its massive Bitcoin reserves, Strategy’s financial health is now in jeopardy. Burry posits that a further 10% fall in Bitcoin could spiral Strategy into an “existential crisis.” Such a scenario would essentially freeze capital markets for the firm, making additional financial maneuvers nearly impossible. This situation has already led to Strategy reporting unrealized losses that exceed $900 million.
Broader Market Sentiment
Investor sentiment isn’t isolated to just Strategy; nearly 200 publicly traded companies hold significant Bitcoin reserves. Burry’s warnings echo a broader narrative of caution, as these firms might face coercive pressures to liquidate holdings to stem further financial damage. This potential wave of corporate sell-offs underscores a significant shift in how Bitcoin’s intrinsic value is perceived. Such a change not only impacts market dynamics but also alters strategic decisions companies make going forward concerning treasury assets.
Michael Burry argues that Bitcoin’s decline is not driven by typical economic drivers that stabilize other assets such as gold and silver. Unlike these metals, Bitcoin’s design does not inherently support resilience against geopolitical tensions or inflation pressures. This lack of intrinsic defense mechanisms against market forces is causing risk managers within companies to advise selling off Bitcoin, thus fueling further market downturns. The outflows from Bitcoin ETFs, highlighted by some of the most significant single-day withdrawals in recent history, further underscore this point.
Institutional Risks and Strategies
In his analysis, Burry points to the strategic missteps made by entities that heavily banked on Bitcoin as a permanent treasury asset without adequately accounting for its volatility. Michael Saylor’s Strategy is highlighted as a pivotal example. With the firm holding a vast Bitcoin stash of over 713,502 BTC, its entire strategic framework is pegged on Bitcoin maintaining or increasing its value. The fallout from its decreased valuation indicates severe repercussions for such aggressive corporate strategies.
These strategies have not seemed to bolster their stability in the face of Bitcoin’s plummeting price below $75K. Despite these adverse conditions, Strategy acquired an additional 855 BTC earlier in the week, reflecting either a calculated risk decision or an attempt at cost-averaging down their holdings. Nonetheless, this further complicates their financial stability and underlines Burry’s caution regarding Bitcoin as a safe haven in corporate financial strategies.
Bitcoin’s Failing as a Safe Haven
The essence of investing in Bitcoin for many institutions was hedging against financial instability. However, Burry’s insights strike at the core of this belief by questioning Bitcoin’s legitimacy as a safe haven. Unlike historically proven assets like gold, which have weathered centuries of financial turbulence, Bitcoin’s track record is nascent and unproven in the face of systematic financial crises.
This perspective is reinforced by Bitcoin’s recent performance, where anticipated price surges have been met with prevailing dips. The digital currency’s failure to react positively to various global risks—rich territory for asset appreciation such as during geopolitical conflicts—further weakens its footing. As Burry emphasizes, the root of Bitcoin’s current predicament is the asset’s incapacity to establish a fundamental, organic use case outside of its speculative allure.
The Future Outlook
Looking ahead, Bitcoin and companies with extensive cryptocurrency portfolios face significant uncertainty. This tension is palpable across several dimensions—from managing risk in capital allocation to handling investor expectations. Burry’s stark warnings may well act as a harbinger, pushing enterprises to reconsider their financial anchorage on cryptocurrencies.
Moreover, Burry’s observations could catalyze broader regulatory scrutiny, which might reshape the investment landscape. With Bitcoin failing to stabilize or rally in the face of existing conditions, regulatory forces could impose stricter standards to protect market participants. Such measures could potentially realign crypto assets within traditional financial frameworks.
There is also the potential for innovation and policy adaptation, wherein the crypto market and involved entities learn from present volatility. By enhancing transparency and mitigating speculative edges, involved parties could evolve into more resilient and stable institutions.
Conclusion
Michael Burry’s analysis prompts broader reflections on the future of Bitcoin and its interfacing with mainstream financial strategies. Companies will increasingly need to apply rigorous analysis to their asset holdings as the lines blur between tangible assets and digital currencies. While Bitcoin continues to evolve, its journey is met with challenges that prompt introspection on its role as a financial asset class. Navigating the tempestuous landscape of cryptocurrencies demands nuanced understanding and strategic foresight—elements that will define winners and losers in the ongoing digital asset saga.
FAQ
What are the consequences of Bitcoin’s decline for companies?
The decline in Bitcoin can lead to significant financial losses for companies that have heavily invested in it. If Bitcoin’s value continues to drop, these companies might face forced asset liquidation and financial instability.
How does Michael Burry view Bitcoin’s utility as a safe haven?
Michael Burry criticizes Bitcoin’s effectiveness as a safe haven compared to traditional assets like gold. He argues that Bitcoin lacks the inherent qualities needed to buffer against economic and geopolitical uncertainties.
What does the correlation between Bitcoin and precious metals indicate?
The observed correlation suggests that fluctuations in Bitcoin prices may indirectly affect the value of traditionally stable assets like gold and silver, evidencing their unexpected codependency in current markets.
Why are risk managers advising companies to sell Bitcoin?
Given the volatile nature of Bitcoin and its impact on company finances, risk managers are advising sales to prevent further losses. This guidance aims to protect the firm’s overall financial health amidst Bitcoin’s price declines.
What is the potential impact on the crypto market from regulatory changes?
Increased regulatory scrutiny, stemming from observed market volatility, could enforce stricter participation standards. This would potentially stabilize the market but also challenge its current decentralization model.
You may also like
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?
Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x
Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames
Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun
Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold
Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar
Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?
Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire
Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition
From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash
The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite
Lean Harness, Fat Skill: The Real Source of 100x AI Productivity
Ultraman is not afraid of his mansion being attacked; he has a fortress.
US-Iran Negotiations Collapse, Bitcoin Faces Battle to Defend $70,000 Level
Reflections and Confusions of a Crypto VC
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
App