Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Bitcoin Price Prediction: Is the $100K “Moon Mission” Back on After the $74K Flush?
Key Takeaways
- Bitcoin stabilizes around $76,273, reflecting active engagement from institutional investors with significant ETF inflows despite recent market volatility.
- The Smarter Web Company (SWC) emerges as Britain’s largest Bitcoin holder, driving corporate Bitcoin adoption in the UK.
- Bitcoin’s technical indicators suggest potential for upward movement with key support holding at approximately $74,500.
- Digital gold tokens are experiencing a surge, though their stability is tested amidst significant market fluctuations.
WEEX Crypto News, 2026-02-04 16:04:59
Navigating Volatility: Bitcoin’s Price Movements
Bitcoin’s recent price trajectory has embodied the volatile yet potentially gratifying nature of cryptocurrency investments. Currently attempting to maintain stability, Bitcoin hovers around $76,273, having experienced a 3% downturn within 24 hours. Despite this dip, investors remain enthralled, especially as spot Bitcoin ETFs witness an influx of $562 million in new investments. This remarkable investment surge in the face of falling prices suggests that large institutional players are strategically seizing lower entry points, reinforcing confidence in Bitcoin’s longevity.
The daily trading volume, reaching a staggering $67.8 billion, underscores the dynamic tug-of-war between traders speculating on Bitcoin’s decline and those betting on its rebound. This arena — where seasoned investors and companies converge — provides a testament to the intricate market mechanisms at play, particularly in light of current geopolitical tensions and regulatory landscapes.
Britain Embraces Bitcoin: The Smarter Web Company’s Strategic Move
In a pivotal development for the UK’s financial ecosystem, The Smarter Web Company (SWC) has officially made its way onto the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange. With this move, SWC now holds the prestigious title of being Britain’s largest publicly listed Bitcoin holder, boasting an impressive 2,674 BTC in its treasury. This achievement thrusts SWC into the global spotlight, ranking it 29th among the world’s publicly listed companies in terms of Bitcoin holdings.
CEO Andrew Webley’s aspirations for SWC extend beyond current accolades, with ambitions to penetrate the FTSE 250 by 2026. This milestone underscores a broader trend towards corporate adoption of Bitcoin within the UK, echoing movements seen in other global financial hubs. The increasing integration of Bitcoin into corporate treasuries signals the growing acceptance and mainstreaming of cryptocurrency as a strategic financial asset.
ETF Warriors: The Battle Over Bitcoin Valuation
After enduring four successive days of substantial withdrawals, spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced a robust resurgence, attracting $562 million in new capital on a recent Monday. This substantial “dip buy” highlights a fundamental belief among investors that Bitcoin’s value proposition remains intact, despite the turbulence that led to a massive $1.5 billion sell-off in the preceding week.
Institutional players, particularly prolific ETF investors, maintain a keen eye on Bitcoin’s trading values, especially as it currently dips below the ETF average cost basis of $84,000. This level serves as a critical support zone, acting akin to a magnet for major funds calibrated to spot emerging opportunities in periods of under-valuation.
While Bitcoin endeavors to navigate beyond its weekend lows — venturing back towards the $79,000 mark — market analysts anticipate that macroeconomic uncertainties, particularly concerning the US monetary policy direction, will remain a formidable counterweight to any nascent recovery momentum.
The Digital Gold Token Surge: A Market Under Test
In parallel to Bitcoin’s unfolding narrative, digital gold tokens such as PAX Gold and Tether Gold have witnessed their market size burgeon, quadrupling since late 2024. This expansion represents a burgeoning flight to safety, as investors seek stable, gold-backed digital assets amid growing market unpredictability.
However, this burgeoning market is not without its challenges. A recent significant one-day plunge in precious metals invites scrutiny towards these tokens, raising pertinent questions about their stability and real-world asset backing during extreme market conditions. Additionally, the potential for dramatic price swings underscores the need for rigorous audits and transparent ownership protocols within the digital token ecosystem.
Bitcoin’s Technical Analysis: Charting the Path Forward
Bitcoin’s price action analysis reveals a complex but intriguing landscape. Post recent correction, Bitcoin’s price has been navigating a stabilization phase after an aggressive “liquidity hunt” sent prices plummeting to a nine-month low of $74,500. Prior to this downturn, Bitcoin was consolidating within a substantial symmetrical triangle pattern, indicative of pent-up bullish potential.
Despite the breach below $80,000 tarnishing immediate bullish sentiment, the long-term prognosis remains optimistic, with a psychological target hovering near $100,000. Technical indicators shed further light on possible future movements. The Daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) has entered the oversold territory between 28 and 30, a zone historically aligned with potential market reversals. Complementing this, a bullish Stochastic crossover suggests that seller fatigue might be setting in, primed for a potential bullish shift.
Critical structural support is pinpointed between $74,420 and $74,666. This support must holistically hold if Bitcoin aims to reclaim higher strata, including a pivotal Fibonacci retracement at $78,400, eventually challenging the formidable $84,000 overhead resistance.
Conclusions: Eyeing the $100K Milestone
Amidst the current market dynamics, the stage appears set for a significant recalibration of leveraged positions. The Smarter Web Company’s pioneering steps towards incorporating Bitcoin into its corporate strategy mirrors a larger institutional trend — one that underscores increasing ETF inflows as evidence of interest reigniting within the cryptocurrency sphere.
Should buyers maintain Bitcoin’s prices securely above the $74,000 threshold, prospects for reaching the elusive $100,000 mark appear more plausible than previously conceived. As Bitcoin’s integration within emerging blockchain solutions like Bitcoin Hyper progresses, avenues for enhancing transaction speed and efficiency further ignite possibilities for future-proofing this digital currency titan.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is driving institutional interest in Bitcoin ETFs despite market volatility?
Institutional interest in Bitcoin ETFs remains robust due to the long-term value perception and strategic acquisition intent during price dips. The substantial $562 million influx after a sell-off emphasizes a calculated bet on Bitcoin’s resilience and future potential.
How is the Smarter Web Company influencing Bitcoin adoption in the UK?
The Smarter Web Company’s strong foray into Bitcoin accumulation, marked by its debut on the London Stock Exchange, signals a dramatic shift towards corporate adoption of cryptocurrency. Their significant holdings emphasize Bitcoin’s growing acceptance as a strategic asset in corporate treasuries.
What role does the ETF average cost basis play in Bitcoin’s price stability?
With Bitcoin trading below the average ETF cost basis of $84,000, this valuation zone provides a substantial magnetic pull for funds seeking to maximize investment value. It strengthens demand at strategic entry points, reinforcing market stability amidst fluctuations.
How do digital gold tokens fit into the current financial landscape?
Digital gold tokens, offering tangible backing via gold reserves, present an attractive investment amidst uncertain economic climates. As prices of these tokens rise, they provide a diversified hedge for investors seeking alternative safety nets outside traditional markets.
What technical indicators are signaling a potential Bitcoin price reversal?
The Daily RSI and a bullish Stochastic crossover on Bitcoin charts highlight oversold conditions ripe for potential reversal. These indicators suggest that aside from macro-economic factors, intrinsic market dynamics could catalyze an upward price trend if critical support levels hold.
You may also like
TAO is Elon Musk, who invested in OpenAI, and Subnet is Sam Altman
The era of "mass coin distribution" on public chains comes to an end
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?
Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x
Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames
Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun
Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold
Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar
Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?
Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire
Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition
From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash
The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite
Lean Harness, Fat Skill: The Real Source of 100x AI Productivity
TAO is Elon Musk, who invested in OpenAI, and Subnet is Sam Altman
The era of "mass coin distribution" on public chains comes to an end
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
App