Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
CME’s Coin Issuance, Wall Street Giants Also Looking to “Hunt” the Stablecoin Market?
Original Title: "CME to Issue Coin? Wall Street Giant's 'New Hunt'"
Original Author: Seed.eth, via Bitpush News
In the power game of Wall Street, giants never miss out; they only wait for the right moment to reap the benefits.
This morning, Terry Duffy, CEO of the world's largest derivatives exchange platform, CME Group, made a statement during the fourth-quarter earnings call that stirred the entire market.
Duffy revealed that CME is actively exploring the issuance of its digital asset: "CME Coin."
This time, it is not merely a technical experiment. Under the narrative of "tokenizing everything," CME's move seems more like a deep "hunt" by traditional finance (TradFi) on crypto-native infrastructure.
1. Positioning Mystery: Chip or Ammunition?
Despite being named "Coin," CME Coin is not the same as the cryptocurrencies known in the crypto sphere. From Duffy's brief response, the following information can be distilled:
The token is intended to operate on a decentralized network.
CME distinguishes it from the developing "Tokenized Cash" project (in collaboration with Google Cloud), labeling them as two separate initiatives.
The CEO emphasized that as a "Systemically Important Financial Institution (SIFI)," the tokens issued by CME far exceed similar products in the market in terms of security. (Editor's Note: SIFI usually refers to large banks, and SIFMU refers to entities like CME that provide clearing and settlement services, with CME's SIFMU status granting it access to a Federal Reserve account.)
It can be observed that the underlying logic of CME Coin leans more towards the digital upgrade of financial infrastructure, with its core functions likely being the following:
· Settlement Tool: Similar to an internal advanced "chip," used for achieving 24/7 instant settlement between institutions.
· Tokenized Collateral: Transforming collateral into liquid tokens, enabling previously locked funds to become active on the blockchain.
2. Why Now? CME's Triple Strategy
The timing of CME's entry is not a coincidence but is based on a triple strategy for its 2026 digitalization initiative:
Addressing "Weekend Liquidity Drought"
CME plans to fully open cryptocurrency futures trading 24/7 by 2026. The traditional bank wire system (FedWire) does not process transactions on weekends. If Bitcoin were to experience a significant drop on a Saturday night, institutions would be unable to transfer funds to top up margin requirements, significantly increasing the risk of liquidation. The emergence of CME Coin, a blockchain-based token that operates around the clock, serves as a "fast-acting lifesaver" for the margin system.
Reclaiming Lost "Interest Profits"
Currently, institutions participating in the crypto market typically need to hold USDT or USDC. This means that tens of billions of dollars are sitting idle with companies like Tether and Circle, allowing these companies to exclusively benefit from the hundreds of millions of dollars in interest generated. The introduction of CME Coin signifies CME's attempt to retain this substantial fund flow within its own balance sheet.
Building a "Compliance Moat"
With BlackRock launching the BUIDL fund and JPMorgan Chase diving into JPM Coin, the giants have reached a consensus: the future of financial competition lies not in securing a position but in the "collateral efficiency" battle.
CME's CEO put it bluntly: compared to tokens issued by third-tier banks or private companies, they trust more in "systemically important" financial behemoths like JPMorgan Chase. While this may sound like risk management, it's actually about setting standards. By raising the requirements for collateral "pedigree," CME is effectively squeezing out existing "private" stablecoins, creating a higher threshold and a more secure "members-only" playground for the core traditional financial sector. The future game plan will have to abide by their rules.
Therefore, CME Coin appears more like a "door-opener" for traditional financial giants seeking to regain control of the narrative in the crypto world. This drama has only just begun.
3. Erosion of Existing Stablecoins?
For a long time, Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC) have dominated the stablecoin market due to their first-mover advantage and liquidity momentum. However, CME's entry is now dismantling their moat from two perspectives:
It's an Asset, But More Importantly a 'Liquidity Move Right'
USDT or USDC is primarily a 'capital ferryman,' while CME deals with derivative positions covering trillions of dollars in interest rates, commodities, equities, and more.
· Heartland Status: Once CME Coin becomes an officially recognized margin asset, it will plug directly into the 'heart' of the global financial system—an underpinning of price discovery and stability assurance.
· Mandatory Holding: CME Coin captures the 'clearing flow.' As long as banks operate on CME, they must become 'mandatory holders' of the token to meet immediate margin calls. This systemically mandated demand is beyond the reach of any native cryptocurrency. According to the January financial report, CME's cryptocurrency daily average trading volume has already reached $12 billion by 2025, with Micro Bitcoin (MBT) and Micro Ethereum (MET) futures contracts showing particular strength.
Collateral is Sovereignty: Reshaping the Market's 'Digital Throat'
In modern finance, collateral is the real throat. It determines who can enter trades and how much leverage they can take.
· Enhanced Intermediary: Contrary to blockchain's advocated 'decentralization,' CME is actually using a digital shell to strengthen its monopoly as a top-tier intermediary.
· Walled Garden: Unlike the seamless DeFi, CME Coin is highly likely to be an institution-exclusive closed-loop game. It lacks open governance and only possesses legally protected clearing rights.
Yield 'Siphon': Tokens launched by Wall Street giants usually come with an 'interest-bearing' feature or fee rebate capability. Faced with over 5% risk-free Treasury yields, institutions have no reason to hold onto non-dividend-paying traditional stablecoins long-term.
Conclusion
In the bigger picture, CME's strategy is not solitary. Recently, JPMorgan introduced tokenized deposit services on Coinbase's Layer 2 blockchain Base through its token called JPM Coin (JPMD). Unlike traditional transfers taking several days to process, JPMD achieves settlement in seconds, quietly altering the position allocation between large financial institutions. The paths of these financial behemoths are eerily similar: embracing blockchain efficiency while holding fast to traditional power structures.
This is not the decentralized finance victory many crypto natives have been waiting for; it is more like a "digital upgrade" of the traditional financial order, where giants are cleverly transforming their former "settlement monopoly" into a future "digital passport."
Once this rule-making, led by them, is completed, the battlefield will be redrawn. At that time, not only today's stablecoins but also tokens issued by many small and medium-sized banks may lose eligibility to compete under this new "compliant" standard.
You may also like
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?
Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x
Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames
Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun
Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold
Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar
Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?
Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire
Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition
From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash
The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite
Lean Harness, Fat Skill: The Real Source of 100x AI Productivity
Ultraman is not afraid of his mansion being attacked; he has a fortress.
US-Iran Negotiations Collapse, Bitcoin Faces Battle to Defend $70,000 Level
Reflections and Confusions of a Crypto VC
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
App