Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Trump Says Crypto Reserve Will Include XRP, Solana, Cardano—And ‘Obviously’ Bitcoin and Ethereum
Key Takeaways
- President Trump announced a strategic U.S. crypto reserve to include digital assets such as XRP, Solana, Cardano, Bitcoin, and Ethereum, aiming to make the U.S. the “crypto capital of the world.”
- Following the announcement, cryptocurrencies like XRP, Solana, and Cardano experienced significant price increases.
- Initially, Bitcoin was excluded from the reserve list, causing confusion; Trump later clarified its inclusion along with Ethereum.
- Trump’s stance has marked a shift towards a more crypto-friendly leadership compared to previous administrations’ regulatory approach.
WEEX Crypto News, 2026-02-04 11:05:55
Trump’s Strategic Crypto Reserve Announcement
On a crisp Sunday, the crypto world was abuzz with a bold proclamation from President Donald Trump regarding the United States’ entry into the digital asset arena. His announcement on the social media platform, Truth Social, ignited discussions as he unveiled plans for a national “crypto reserve.” This reserve is set to include notable digital currencies: XRP, Solana, Cardano, and later clarified to incorporate Bitcoin and Ethereum. This move is part of an overarching strategy to elevate the United States as the hub of crypto innovation and governance amidst global competition.
Initial Announcement and Impact
President Trump’s opening message on Truth Social highlighted the crypto reserve without mentioning Bitcoin, the most recognized cryptocurrency, which raised eyebrows across the digital finance sector. This omission left many perplexed, questioning how a reserve excluding the most significant player by market capitalization could achieve its ambitious objectives. The initial absence was seen not just as an oversight but as a potential statement, causing waves of speculation within the crypto community.
However, in a follow-up post, Trump addressed this skepticism head-on. “And, obviously, BTC and ETH, as other valuable cryptocurrencies, will be at the heart of the reserve. I also love Bitcoin and Ethereum!” he announced, effectively quelling concerns and reiterating his support for the two leading digital assets. Upon this clarification, Bitcoin’s price saw a boost, jumping over 7.6% to surpass $91,000, highlighting the market’s sensitivity to influential policy statements.
The market reactions were swift. XRP, for instance, witnessed a 21% jump to $2.61, marking its highest point in more than a week. Solana recorded a 12.5% increase to $158, and Cardano surged 37% to $0.87, the most substantial price uptick in nearly a month. These bursts in valuation were seen as a direct response to leverage perceived from the administration’s endorsement.
The Strategic Reserve Goal
Trump’s announcement comes amid discussions on how digital assets are becoming pivotal components of modern financial ecosystems. By establishing a strategic crypto reserve, the administration is signaling its intention to embrace this shift and lead it. In his post, Trump criticized the previous administration’s regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies, suggesting it was fraught with corrupt and inhibitive practices. His executive order directs the Presidential Working Group to fast-track the establishment of the Crypto Strategic Reserve, tasked with shielding these assets and fostering U.S. leadership in crypto-related innovations.
The President’s vision paints a picture of the United States as not only a participant but a leader in the global cryptocurrency market. By positioning itself as a crypto capital, the U.S. aims to attract talent, capital, and innovation in the blockchain space, directly challenging the dominance of tech hubs in other regions.
Reaffirming Campaign Promises
This latest policy aligns with Trump’s campaign promises, which often highlighted his pro-crypto stance. During his campaign, he pledged to build a strategic Bitcoin reserve, asserting that under his leadership, the U.S. would retain all Bitcoin held by the government. This policy proposal underlined his belief in Bitcoin’s strategic significance as a hedge and an innovation driver.
During a speech at Bitcoin 2024 in Nashville, Trump elaborated on this vision, stressing the importance of maintaining the country’s existing Bitcoin holdings and potentially expanding them as cryptocurrencies gain more mainstream traction. This announcement was met with enthusiasm from Bitcoin advocates who had been critical of federal attempts to centralize digital currency control, viewing the reserve as a means to secure and legitimize cryptocurrency within national economic policy.
Ripple’s Role and Market Reactions
Notably, Ripple and its associated digital asset, XRP, have been at the center of this strategic conversation. The company, which stands accused of trying to shift the narrative away from a Bitcoin-centric approach, found itself in a favorable position following Trump’s announcement. The endorsement helped dispel prior allegations of undermining Bitcoin reserve efforts and provided a significant reputational boost.
Ripple’s co-founders have long advocated for a broader inclusion in digital asset strategies, and the President’s decision has solidified their position within the heart of U.S. crypto policy. This alignment may potentially catalyze further mainstream adoption of Ripple’s technology, such as cross-border payment solutions leveraging XRP, especially if supported by federal frameworks.
Moving Forward: Challenges and Opportunities
While the strategic reserve marks an ambitious policy shift, it also introduces challenges. Chief among these is how the reserve will balance competing interests within the crypto ecosystem. Moreover, navigating regulatory landscapes and ensuring market stability without stifling innovation will be crucial to realizing Trump’s vision.
Furthermore, the broader adoption of cryptocurrencies poses significant questions regarding regulatory frameworks, particularly pertaining to tax implications, compliance requirements, and security measures. Crafting legislation that strikes the right balance between oversight and freedom will be essential to attracting investment while protecting consumer interests.
Industry Reactions and Market Dynamics
The responses from industry stakeholders have been mixed and vocal. Notably, companies like Coinbase, OpenSea, and Robinhood—some of which faced regulatory scrutiny under the previous administration—may find renewed support and stability under the new regime. This shift could encourage expansion and innovation across platforms that have previously operated under the cloud of potential legal challenges.
As the policy takes shape, it may also lead to fluctuations and adjustments in crypto market dynamics. Stakeholders within and outside of the U.S. will closely observe how these changes impact global crypto finance trends, with strategic implications for international competition in digital currency innovation.
Continuation of a Bold Vision
President Trump’s crypto initiative is a testament to the evolving nature of digital finance policy in the U.S. It reflects a growing acknowledgment of cryptocurrencies’ influence over global economic systems. As the reserve materializes, it will serve as both a symbol of intent and a platform for further crypto innovation, offering the U.S. a strategic vantage point in the rapidly evolving digital economy.
The long-term implications of this reserve will play out over the coming years, with significant potentials ranging from enhancing economic resilience to diversifying asset strategies in times of market unpredictability. As stakeholders and policymakers alike grapple with these developments, the U.S.’s journey to becoming a “crypto capital” remains a story in the making, promising opportunities for leadership in uncharted financial territories.
FAQs
What is the U.S. Crypto Reserve, and why was it announced?
The U.S. Crypto Reserve is a strategic initiative announced by President Trump to bolster the country’s position in the global digital asset market. It aims to include significant cryptocurrencies like XRP, Solana, Cardano, Bitcoin, and Ethereum to promote innovation and establish the U.S. as the crypto capital of the world.
Why was Bitcoin left out initially in Trump’s announcement about the crypto reserve?
Bitcoin was initially omitted from the announcement, sparking confusion among market observers. However, Trump later clarified that Bitcoin, along with Ethereum, would be central to the reserve’s structure.
How did markets react to Trump’s crypto reserve announcement?
Following the announcement, notable cryptocurrencies like XRP, Solana, and Cardano experienced significant price increases. Bitcoin’s price also surged after Trump’s clarification of its inclusion in the reserve.
What implications does this announcement have for U.S. crypto policy?
Trump’s announcement signals a shift towards a more favorable regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies. It contrasts with the previous administration, proposing the creation of a crypto-friendly ecosystem that could attract global innovators and investors.
How will the strategic reserve impact Ripple and its asset, XRP?
Ripple, closely associated with XRP, found favor with the announced policy, dispelling prior concerns about being adversarial to a Bitcoin-centric reserve approach. The endorsement might boost Ripple’s reputation and operational scope in mainstream financial applications.
You may also like
TAO is Elon Musk, who invested in OpenAI, and Subnet is Sam Altman
The era of "mass coin distribution" on public chains comes to an end
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?
Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x
Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames
Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun
Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold
Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar
Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?
Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire
Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition
From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash
The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite
Lean Harness, Fat Skill: The Real Source of 100x AI Productivity
TAO is Elon Musk, who invested in OpenAI, and Subnet is Sam Altman
The era of "mass coin distribution" on public chains comes to an end
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
App