They already knew the TGA Game of the Year in advance and made tens of thousands of dollars.

By: blockbeats|2025/12/12 16:00:01
0
Share
copy

Today, the highly anticipated TGA (The Game Awards) in the gaming world finally came to a close.

Let's rewind to 3 hours before the end of the awards ceremony. At this moment, the "Best Indie Game" had just been awarded to the popular title "Light and Shadow: Expedition 33," but this made many fans worry instead. Never in history has a game won both the "Best Indie Game" and the "Game of the Year (GOTY)" awards at TGA.

As the frontrunner for the GOTY, "Light and Shadow" now needed to break the curse that had existed since TGA's inception, creating an unprecedented moment in the gaming world.

Just as everyone was anxiously concerned, a mysterious individual registered an account on a seemingly unrelated "prediction market" platform and deposited ten thousand dollars. He found the topic on the platform asking, "Will Light and Shadow win the 2025 GOTY?" and placed his entire ten thousand dollar deposit on "yes."

At this time, the price representing the probability of the topic being "yes" was $0.98 per share, which meant that even if "Light and Shadow" did make history by winning both awards, his ten thousand dollar bet would only yield a profit of less than two hundred dollars. However, if "Light and Shadow" failed to break the TGA curse, the probability of this topic would instantly drop to 0, which meant his newly deposited ten thousand dollars would be lost.

Just how much must a fervent fan of "Light and Shadow" love the game to take such a reckless risk? How did the prediction market attract gamers from around the world to speculate in advance on the frontrunners for the awards?

The "Predetermined" Script

As early as October 30, a month and a half before the awards ceremony, the prediction market Polymarket launched the topic of the "2025 Game of the Year." The odds of "Light and Shadow" winning were firmly above 80% from the start, while the probabilities of other highly anticipated AAA titles winning were kept below 10%. Due to such a one-sided situation, which usually only occurs in events where the outcome is already certain, many traders sensed a hint of unusualness: this was not just optimism, this was certainty.

Among these traders who held a "certain" attitude, there were several whose trading styles were extremely uniform. DieselDiesel, trumpnogo, and kasae all bet on "Light and Shadow winning TGA 2025 GOTY" when the probability was around 85%, with their bets exceeding their usual amounts by tens or even hundreds of times. This highly concentrated, abnormal betting behavior exposed them to significant risks: if Light and Shadow ultimately did not win, they would not only lose all their past profits but also face substantial losses.

As time passed and the odds of winning The Game Awards increased, they did not profit by selling any of their held shares. Even with a significant unrealized gain hours before the award announcement, after the "Best Indie Game" award had already been announced, they remained unfazed as if they could see the future, joining forces with the mysterious figure mentioned at the beginning of this article to wager their entire account balance for a modest profit.

The Awarding of History and the Insider's Payoff

Amidst doubt and anxiety, as if following a script these traders had set over a month ago, The Game Awards dispelled the final suspense: the highly anticipated game, "Light and Shadow," having already won the "Best Indie Game" award, broke a historical curse and won the Best Game of the Year award.

While players on one side rejoiced, on the other side, the prediction market unveiled the final mystery: three traders who were certain a month ago that "Light and Shadow" would win the award solidified their roles as "seers," realizing massive profits:

DieselDiesel made a profit of $5,357 in this event, representing 176% of all their other trading profits;

trumpnogo made a profit of $2,958 in this event, representing 62% of all their other trading profits;

kasae made a profit of $1,658 in this event, representing 220% of all their other trading profits.

As for the mysterious figure mentioned at the beginning (bobo9997), they bet $10,000 on "Light and Shadow" making history to win $200.

They already knew the TGA Game of the Year in advance and made tens of thousands of dollars.

Even Soothsayers Have to Eat

The most noteworthy commonality among these four traders is that while many players doubted whether "Light and Shadow" could break the historical curse, they were willing to risk nearly $100,000 in their positions to "bet" that this historic moment would occur. However, the proceeds from this "gamble" amounted to less than $2,000 combined.

At this point, let's assume these "seers" were TGA tally audit officials. For these insider individuals with a $100,000 annual income, if they were to monetize the information in a traditional manner, they would need to sell the insider information to platforms, risking various potential fines, dismissal, or even imprisonment.

Yet, with the advent of prediction markets, they could anonymously exchange the information gap for an amount equivalent to 1 to 3 months of their disposable income.

When we view everything through the lens of an insider who is assumed to already know the outcome, everything becomes clear: In a situation where it is already 100% certain that "Light and Shadow" will be the GOTY, their "wager" at the last moment is simply using the one-hour waiting time before the award ceremony to exchange for a seemingly high-risk yet actually variable-free profit of two thousand dollars.

This type of high-risk, yet variable-free earning "wager" for them was almost impossible to encounter before platforms like prediction markets emerged.

However, with the rise of Polymarket, how many people can resist converting information into tangible rewards in an anonymous manner?

-- Price

--

You may also like

a16z founder's Stanford lecture: Whenever Wall Street and Silicon Valley have different ideas, it's Wall Street that ends up being wrong

Ben Horowitz, co-founder of a16z, delivered a powerful talk: The two traditional moats of software in the AI era have been erased, and entrepreneurs must seek "new barriers" beyond code and UI.

Michael Saylor: After three consecutive quarters of losses, Strategy will sell Bitcoin to pay dividends

After MSTR's financial report showed continued net losses, Saylor changed his stance: Bitcoin is no longer "never to be sold" and can be used as a payment tool.

The toll station at Hormuz and the RMB that cannot be bought

The disorder of the US dollar is giving rise to a new situation in global settlement: gold is being redefined as a "bridge," the CIPS system is expanding rapidly, and global funds are quietly opening up a new channel for the renminbi, which is "hard to obtain."

Interview with Coinbase Institutional's Strategic Head: The Institutionalization of Crypto Reaches a Critical Point

Coinbase executives provide an in-depth analysis: Unfazed by short-term market panic, institutions are accelerating their entry, and tokenization along with the "exchange of everything" is about to completely reconstruct the global financial infrastructure.

Dialogue with Agora CEO Nick: The battle for stablecoin licenses has just begun

Agora strikes: officially applies for a federal trust bank license in the United States, elevating from a stablecoin issuer to "underlying financial infrastructure," targeting the trillion-dollar enterprise payment and B2B settlement market.

Morning Report | a16z Crypto completes $2.2 billion fundraising for its fifth fund; Bullish invests $4.2 billion to acquire share transfer agency Equiniti; PayPal's Q1 performance exceeds expectations

Overview of Important Market Events on May 5th

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:[email protected]
VIP Program:[email protected]