WEEX AI Wars II Round 4 Recap: Humans Ruled the Leaderboard. How Did AI Tied the War?

By: WEEX|10/06/2026 09:15:00

TL;DR

  • Round 4 (Sept 28–Oct 2) of WEEX AI Wars II is over — and Team AI has done it again, winning its second consecutive round.
  • Team Human completely dominated the individual leaderboard, taking all 10 spots in the combined Top 10.
  • But individual dominance wasn’t enough. Team AI won Round 4, following its comeback victory in Round 3.
  • The season score is now 2:2: Humans won Rounds 1 and 2; AI answered with wins in Rounds 3 and 4.
  • Only Round 5 remains. One round. One winner. Human or AI.
  • Don’t want to trade? Pick your side and predict who wins the final battle.

Round 4: Humans Dominated the Top 10. AI Won Anyway.

Round 3 looked like a plot twist. Round 4 suggests it may have been something more.

Human traders were once again untouchable at the top of the individual leaderboard. All ten positions in the combined Top 10 belonged to Team Human. The No.1 trader, 98***09, finished with an extraordinary +1,384.15% ROI, while 如果的如 followed at +1,089.69%. Third place, 71***79, recorded +595.57%, with fourth and fifth place reaching +523.14% and +357.10% respectively.

Even the human trader ranked tenth finished at +285.31% ROI.

Team AI looked almost restrained by comparison. FxProfessor AI led the AI leaderboard with +73.53% ROI, followed by 80***67 at +59.05%* and 惊蛰量化 at +47.47%. The tenth-ranked AI strategy returned just +3.46%.

Look only at the biggest winners, and there is no contest. Human traders produced far more explosive returns. The best human result was almost 19 times the ROI of the best AI strategy.

And yet, Team AI won Round 4.

AI Has Missed the Top 10 Twice — and Won Twice

That is now the most interesting pattern of AI Wars II.

In both Round 3 and Round 4, Team AI failed to place a single strategy in the combined Top 10. In both rounds, Team AI still won the overall team battle.

Round 4 makes the contrast especially visible. The human side produced enormous individual winners, while the AI Top 10 was far less spectacular. But all ten AI strategies shown on the leaderboard remained in positive territory, ranging from +73.53% to +3.46%.

The results suggest two very different approaches to the same market.

Humans have been better at producing outliers. AI has been better at avoiding the need for them.

Human trading in this competition has shown a much wider range of outcomes: aggressive decisions can create four-digit returns at the top of the leaderboard, but that same appetite for risk can also create greater dispersion across the team. AI strategies, by contrast, appear more conservative. Their upside has been dramatically lower, but their results have also been more stable.

That does not mean one approach is inherently superior. It means the competition is beginning to expose the trade-off between them.

Humans are winning the race for maximum return. AI is increasingly making a case for consistency.

And in a team competition, consistency matters.

From 2:0 to 2:2: The War Has Completely Reset

The trajectory of the season could hardly have been more dramatic.

Team Human won Round 1 and followed it with another victory in Round 2. At 2:0, the contest looked as though it might become a demonstration of how difficult it still is for machines to compete with human traders in a live market.

Then Round 3 changed the story.

Despite humans once again controlling the individual leaderboard, AI delivered its first team victory. It raised an obvious question: was this simply one unusual round, or had AI found an advantage in its more controlled approach?

Round 4 has made that question much harder to dismiss.

For the second consecutive round, humans produced the stars. For the second consecutive round, AI produced the team win.

2:0 has become 2:2.

Now neither side has an advantage.

Round 5 Will Decide Everything

There is only one battle left.

Round 5 runs October 5–9, with the final results scheduled for October 12. After four rounds, the competition has arrived at the cleanest possible finale: Human 2:2 AI.

For Team Human, the mission is no longer simply to put another trader at the top of the leaderboard. Humans have already proved they can generate extraordinary returns. The final challenge is whether that individual firepower can translate into a team victory when it matters most.

For Team AI, Round 5 offers the chance to complete a remarkable comeback. After falling behind 0:2, AI has won two consecutive rounds without putting a single strategy into the combined Top 10. One more win would turn that comeback into a 3:2 series victory.

And that makes the final round more than a race for the highest ROI.

It is becoming a live test of two very different trading philosophies: human conviction and risk-taking versus AI discipline and consistency.

One Round Left. Which Side Are You On?

You don’t have to be at the top of the leaderboard — or even place a single trade — to be part of the finale.

With the series tied 2:2, the final prediction is also the hardest one yet. Humans have dominated the individual leaderboard with explosive returns. AI has won two rounds in a row without a single strategy entering the combined Top 10, making consistency its strongest argument.

So who takes Round 5?

  • Pick a side: Back Team Human or Team AI. Get the prediction right, and you can stack extra points on top of everything else you earn. After four rounds, are you betting on human firepower or AI consistency?
  • Complete tasks, earn points: Daily check-ins, likes, social shares, and trading milestones all contribute to the task pool. You don’t need a four-digit ROI to participate — just get involved.
  • Turn points into real rewards: Earn rewards worth up to 0.1 BTC, including BTC and ETH, WXT tokens, VIP experience, USDT trial funds, and more.

Whether you’re competing for the leaderboard or watching the Human vs. AI battle from the sidelines, Round 5 is the last chance to make your call.

Pick your side.

About WEEX

Founded in 2018, WEEX has developed into a global crypto exchange with over 10 million users across more than 170 countries. The platform emphasizes security, liquidity, and usability, providing over 2,700 assets and offering up to 400x leverage in crypto futures trading. In addition to the traditional spot and derivatives markets, WEEX is expanding rapidly in the AI era delivering real time AI news, empowering users with AI trading tools, and exploring innovative trade to earn models that make intelligent trading more accessible to everyone. Its 1,000 BTC Protection Fund further strengthens asset safety and transparency, while features such as copy trading and advanced trading tools allow users to follow professional traders and experience a more efficient, intelligent trading journey.

 

Follow WEEX on social media

X: @WEEX_Official

Instagram: @WEEX Exchange

Tiktok: @weex_global

Youtube: @WEEX_Official

Discord: WEEX Community

Telegram: WeexGlobal Group

This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.

You may also like

INTW vs. MUU vs. MVLL: 2x Long Single-Stock Semiconductor ETF Comparison

INTW, MUU, and MVLL are single-stock leveraged ETFs tied to Intel, Micron Technology, and Marvell Technology. They aim to deliver about 2x the daily positive performance of the corresponding stock, making them short-term, high-risk tools rather than ordinary long-term semiconductor ETFs.

IAU vs. SLV vs. PPLT vs. PALL: Precious Metals ETF Comparison

IAU, SLV, PPLT, and PALL are all precious metals ETFs, but they track different metals and follow different price drivers. Gold is more tied to safe-haven and monetary demand, silver combines precious metal and industrial demand, while platinum and palladium are more closely linked to auto and industrial cycles.

USO vs. UNG vs. URA vs. COPX: Energy and Industrial Metals ETF Comparison

USO, UNG, URA, and COPX all relate to energy or industrial metals, but their structures differ significantly. USO and UNG mainly use futures contracts, while URA and COPX mainly hold related company stocks, so their risks may come from very different sources.

SPY vs. QQQ vs. TQQQ: Key Differences and Investment Strategies

SPY, QQQ, and TQQQ may look similar because they are all equity ETFs, but they serve very different purposes. SPY is commonly used for broad large-cap exposure, QQQ focuses more on technology and growth stocks, while TQQQ is a leveraged trading tool with amplified volatility and higher risk.

SOXL vs. SOXS vs. SMH vs. SOXX: Key Differences and ETF Guide

Semiconductor ETFs cover the semiconductor value chain, including chip design, manufacturing, equipment, and memory, offering diversified exposure to the sector.SMH and SOXX are unleveraged ETFs, while SOXL and SOXS are daily 3x leveraged products for bullish and bearish exposure, with greater risks from volatility, compounding, and holding periods.

$BTC at $84K, Institutions Buying SOL & TradFi Heating Up: What WEEX Daily Lucky Eggs S2 Offers Traders

Bitcoin holds near $84K as institutional crypto inflows rise and macro volatility builds. Explore the market outlook and trade Crypto & TradFi with WEEX Lucky Eggs S2.
...

Latest coin listings on WEEX

iconiconiconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:[email protected]
VIP Program:[email protected]